Monday, September 24, 2007

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20070919/tap-thailand-accident-air-c8d5519.html

The Thai air plane crash that has been all over the news recently is now nearing its final moments and with its closing comes several new revelations. While the facts and amount of injured and confirmed blow are without doubt some of the more important parts of the article, the fact that the plane was twice as old as it was previously thought to be is far more thought-provoking. Certainly, it is not a good indication on the budget airlines and the Thai authorities’ part, and the tourism industry will certainly be feeling the effects. And yet, one must ask why such a basic mistake might be made.

Of course, any such guesses will not receive any indication of truth from the Thai authorities. However, possibly, it is simply because there is far too much information regarding every little detail, every small fact in the running of the country. Even the most advanced computers, and even the neatest filing systems have their limits and while the truth remains and in fact has already been found, it is nigh-impossible for everything to be available at a moment’s notice.

This is also seen in how the cause of the plane crash has still not been discovered. There are far too many factors to consider. The article names bad weather, dangerous wind conditions, airport malfunctions, and pilot error, each amazingly detailed and complicated upon study, and more importantly, each a separate field in one process. To fully understand the situation is to require the meteorologists, pilots, and aviation experts. Vutichai Singhamany, a safety director at the Department of Civil Aviation, states "the investigation will take time -- I cannot say how long.’

There have been many cases of similar cases, and it has always been said that ‘accidents happen’. This incident of the budget plane crash is but one in a series of many that attests the limits of the human ability and what happens when one ventures too far into the field of human error. Of course steps are always taken to reduce the possibility of human error, but until the day where every single last process can be automated and carried out by technology, which appears to be in the distance, it will still continue to exist. The right way and the only way to respond is to try to improve yet again, pick up the pieces, and continue to move forwards, like what the Thai authorities have tried to do.

2 comments:

GunnerBoyz said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
GunnerBoyz said...

Intepretation
Profound (4)
Good intepretation by stating properly the factors and the impact of the plane crash.
Application
Skilled (3)
The issue is brought up fairly well but could respond more about the impacts and personal experiences.
Perspective
Considered (3)
Since this is a comment about an accident, there is not much viewpoints to be given. However, it is good that he said that this accident was inevitable.
Empathy
Developing (2)
This is a weak point of this piece of work. He does not incorporate the feelings of others and how the airline personnel or the victims would feel.
Self-Knowledge
Circumspect (3)
He is fairly aware of the limitations of his knowledge but this could be better shown.